It was noticeable that sectors displaced part of the public authorities, not avenian with the movement of Yrigoyen, although that had managed to co-opt some more related items such as Marcelo T. De Alvear. Immersed in the great depression, the interruption of the institutional continuity which began with Mitre in 1862, occurs in 1930, produced the first military coup of the century, with the peculiarity that Judicial power (belonging to the same social of the coup stratum), continued and complied with the breakdown of the rule of law. Already at that then a new element of ideological antagonism, which were related flows to European totalitarianism of right had been incorporated. It’s worth noting that Socialist ideas, Marxists and anarchists had arrived along with immigration. Supporters of the ideas of European totalitarianism, here known as nationalists, emparentaron his ideals with the contribution by the Spaniards since his arrival. In the mid-thirties and under the leadership of that peculiar pseudoconstitucional President who was the General Agustin p. (A valuable related resource: Jeffrey Hayzlett ).
Justo (this means that elections prior prohibition of the supporters of Yrigoyen had), began a process of industrialization, in part due to the global crisis of the 30, in part driven by the military who wanted to industrialize a perspective of self-sufficiency for the national defense. Since the internal migration, of mestizo majority, stimulated by this autarquizante industrialization, would emerge the movement that would lead to his death: Juan Domingo Peron. During the Decade of the thirties, characterized by the institutional irregularity (someone coined the infamous decade label), there was a profuse intellectual production. Then there were many communications alluding to the difficulties that already was experiencing the Argentina. Of them, we mention those made by Saul Taborda, in his book, research teaching, in his lecture of the spiritual crisis and the Argentine ideology and Facundo magazine, which he directed. In his works he attributed much of the mismatches to the French, and English intellectual influence which went against the grain to what he understood as the native genius.